Search this site
by Faculty Name
by Publication Type
by Academic Area
HKS Faculty Research
FRC User's Guide
Submit New & Edit Current Publication Citations
Browse Academic Area
Academic Area Results
Malcolm Wiener Professor of Social Policy
Academic Journal/Scholarly Articles
Chandra, Amitabh, Jason Shafrin, and Ravinder Dhawan. "Utility of Cancer Value Frameworks for Patients, Payers, and Physicians."
Journal of the American Medical Association
315.19 (May 17, 2016): 2069-2070.
In recent years, novel cancer therapies have improved the expected survival of patients but have also increased treatment costs. As a result of these increases, patients are concerned about increasing out-of-pocket costs, clinicians must assess whether “do no harm” includes patient financial harm, and payers want to know if novel therapies are worth the cost.1 To answer these questions, some organizations have created value frameworks that can be applied to cancer therapies. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO),2 European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO),3 Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER),4 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC),5 and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)6 have all developed value frameworks. These organizations define value conceptually as a measure of treatment benefits relative to cost, but each organization uses a different method for measuring value. This Viewpoint describes the methodological differences across these frameworks and provides recommendations for improving them for clinicians, patients, and payers.
Copyright © 2017 The President and Fellows of Harvard College